|
Recovering
from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome:
A Guide to Self-Empowerment
By William Collinge,
Ph.D.
Table of Contents
PART I. THE NATURE
AND COURSE OF CFS
Chapter 1. From
Illness to Insight:
Understanding CFS
"I appreciate life more than I have ever appreciated it before. I believe
that CFS has left me, although I understand that I'm still vulnerable,
so when I get tired I get a little fear... I see life as a blessing now,
and I don't take it for granted. I have more faith in myself, having made
it through the worst year of my whole life.
"I thought about suicide. I didn't try it, but it was very attractive to
me. Death would have been welcomed. I questioned how I was going to provide
for myself.
"I believe I have more energy than before, but I'm more centered, more
within myself and less concerned about my outer world. My energy has a
different quality."
- Linda
Perhaps you
are reading these words because you or someone you know has Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome (CFS), also known as Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome
(CFIDS) or Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME). If this is the case, there is
a fact you need to embrace right now, even though you may find it difficult
to believe: Recovery is possible. I emphasize this at the outset because
so often people with CFS lack belief in the possibility of healing. Rarely
have they met a person like Linda who can look back on CFS.
Why might
the notion of recovery come as a surprise? It may be because of the syndrome's
effects on one's morale and ability to envision a better future. Or it
may be due to the social isolation that often comes with this syndrome.
Perhaps it results from the media's sensational images of debilitation
and hopelessness. Or it may be that a few support groups have inadvertently
reinforced the image of "CFS victim." Or perhaps the syndrome simply has
not been observed over a long enough period to shed much light on life
after CFS.
This book
is an outcome of the first complementary therapy program designed specifically
for CFS. The term "complementary" refers to any approach that works along
side and supports established medical treatment. The program originated
at Incline Village, Nevada, on the north shore of Lake Tahoe, as a result
of the widely publicized outbreak of the mid-1980's. Our purpose was to
help patients empower themselves to be full participants in their recovery.
With the
cooperation of Daniel Peterson, M.D., co-discoverer of the outbreak, the
program was based on a synthesis of research in behavioral medicine and
CFS. This included insights gained from my work with exceptional cancer
and AIDS patients -- long-term survivors and those with unexpected recoveries.
As with those other illnesses, profound lifestyle change, introspection,
and self-help strategies are integral to recovery from CFS. There are of
course features unique to this syndrome, and the program was tailored accordingly.
Our initial
participants were referred by Dr. Peterson to complement his medical treatment.
It soon became apparent that those who participated in this approach had
better outcomes than those who relied on medical treatment alone. At this
writing the program has served patients from fourteen states, and their
family members. Patients have often cited this work as the turning point
in their recovery.
In these
pages you will learn the principles and strategies used by former CFS patients
to heal physically, emotionally, and spiritually. You will hear in their
own words what the healing process has been like for them. As a full, active
participant in your treatment, you too will rediscover your health.
A note
about labels: Another way of referring to a person with this syndrome is
"PWC," for "Person with CFIDS." This term arose out of the need to affirm
the authenticity of the syndrome, and to give patients a sense of shared
identity. While I appreciate both of these concerns, I still prefer the
less-than-perfect term "CFS patient" because it suggests the transitory
nature of CFS, whereas "PWC" may inadvertently suggest an enduring identity.
I agree that calling oneself a PWC may be helpful, especially in the early
stages of coping with the syndrome, my broader interest is in helping people
dis-identify with the syndrome as a definition of who they are.
WHAT IS CFS?
It is not
uncommon for people to have seen over two dozen doctors before getting
this diagnosis. While this problem is diminishing, it exists because CFS
is the name for a syndrome, a "bag of symptoms," rather than for a cause.
By contrast, strep throat, for example, is named for its known cause --
the streptococcus bacterium -- rather that its symptoms.
Because
there is so much ambiguity surrounding this syndrome, many people with
CFS have run a gauntlet of different diagnoses. Some of the most difficult
to accept were those of depression or psychosomatic disorders, which seemed
to blame the patient. Even worse for many was being given no diagnosis.
In retrospect, these were treated most honestly, at least not having been
mislabeled.
For anyone
who has followed the research of the neurologic and immunologic abnormalities
of this syndrome, there is no longer any question that it exists. However,
there is naturally a period of lag time between when a new syndrome is
identified and when the medical community at large integrates this new
information.
Fortunately
the medical literature is acknowledging the existence of this syndrome
and health care providers are becoming informed about it. If your doctor
seems uninformed or uninterested, you can get a list of recommended doctors
in your area by contacting the CFIDS Association (see Appendix C).
The Challenge of Making the Diagnosis
Diagnosis
of CFS is complicated by the fact that fatigue is the single most commonly
reported complaint in physicians' offices. It is a feature of countless
other conditions. Hence there is a need to rule out other illnesses, many
of which have more concrete diagnostic criteria and well-defined treatments.
Figure
1 below helps put the problem of fatigue into perspective. The largest
circle represents the general complaint of fatigue as a symptom for a wide
range of conditions. The next smaller circle encompasses chronic fatigue
-- fatigue on a more enduring basis, but which could still be the result
of a range of conditions. The smallest circle represents the distinct condition
known as CFS or CFIDS, which includes a unique grouping of symptoms including
brain and immune system irregularities.
Figure 1. The Diagnosis of
"Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" in Relation to Other Kinds of Fatigue Complaints
According to the Centers
for Disease Control (CDC), the major criteria for a diagnosis of CFS include:
(1) New
onset of persistent or relapsing, debilitating fatigue or easy fatigability
in a person who has no previous history of similar symptoms, that does
not resolve with bed rest, and that is severe enough to reduce or impair
average daily activity below 50% of the patient's premorbid (before illness)
activity level for a period of at least six months.
(2) Other
clinical conditions that may produce similar symptoms must be excluded
by thorough evaluation, based on history, physical examination, and appropriate
laboratory findings.
It is not
the purpose of this book to focus on the nuances of diagnosis or medical
treatment. These should be addressed through direct consultation with competent
medical help. The interested reader is referred to Appendix A for more
detail about the CDC diagnostic criteria, and Appendix B for a summary
of known medical treatments. It is my purpose to offer a practical, realistic
perspective on the syndrome once diagnosed, and on how to fully participate
in your recovery. Toward this end, let us consider what CFS really is.
A Definition
There have
been countless attempts to characterize this syndrome, usually with long,
cumbersome lists of symptoms, but great progress has been made in refining
our understanding. One of the most concise descriptions is offered by Jay
Goldstein, M.D., Director of the Chronic Fatigue Institute in Beverly Hills,
CA who states: "There is an increasing consensus that CFS is a virally
induced, cytokine-mediated psychoneuroimmunologic disorder that occurs
in genetically predisposed individuals."
This brief
yet thorough definition is tremendously significant. If you can understand
each of its parts, you will understand much about not only CFS, but the
predominant health crises of this decade including cancer, environmental
illness, AIDS, and even heart disease. Before we examine the parts of this
explanation more closely, let us first step back to view it in a broader
context.
THE MULTICAUSAL PERSPECTIVE
The significance
of Goldstein's statement is that it embodies the "multicausal perspective."
This represents an historic shift in how the medical world thinks about
what determines health and illness. The shift is from a single-cause approach
to a multicausal approach.
In the
multicausal perspective, health status is the outcome of several factors
working together, not a single factor such as a virus. These factors include
heredity, environment, lifestyle, and medical treatment (see illustration
below). They operate together to determine your resistance to illness,
as well as the timing and severity of illness. Let us look more closely
at each of these factors before we return to the description of CFS.
Heredity
We take
for granted that our height and hair color are genetically determined,
yet there are also genetic differences in how our immune systems function.
This makes one person more vulnerable to certain types of cancer, another
to certain types of viruses, and leaves a third perhaps more vulnerable
to autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis or rheumatoid arthritis.
A fourth person may be effectively resistant to all these immune-related
diseases, yet may succumb to a disease process in another system, such
as heart disease. This helps explain how a genetically determined vulnerability
may be a factor in CFS.
Environment
Obviously
pathogens such as viruses and bacteria come from the environment around
you. But the influence of the environment on your health also includes
toxins and pollutants that have accumulated in your body and may affect
your resistance to illness. For example, growing up downwind from a nuclear
testing site in the 1950's or in a farming community where agricultural
chemicals had seeped into the water table, can have a definite impact on
your resistance. And of course there are the petrochemicals and other substances
in your current environment, some of which we have yet to discover, which
may chronically disturb your immune functioning.
Medical Treatment
Various
kinds of medical treatment that you have received over your lifetimes can
support your immune system while others may actually weaken it. For instance,
there is evidence that antibiotics, though having saved countless lives,
may actually weaken immunity under some circumstances. This is especially
true in people who have had many courses of antibiotics or taken them for
a long period of time. The effects may be direct, via the chemicals affecting
white cell functioning. Or they may be indirect, by altering the intestinal
flora in a way that fosters yeast overgrowth, with the toxic by-products
of yeast activity weakening immunity.
Also there
is an interesting debate over whether immunizations may interfere with
normal immunity. Most of us growing up in the second half of this century
have had heavy doses of antibiotics and various immunizations. Many other
drugs we commonly take have not been around long enough to truly reveal
their long term effects.
Lifestyle
Lifestyle
includes your patterns of rest and exercise, work and play habits, nutrition,
loving relationships, emotional stress, self-help practices, and your attitudes
toward living. All these factors have impact on the body's ability to resist
illness. In the case of an illness such as CFS where there is no proven
medical cure, this aspect of the multicausal perspective takes on even
greater significance.
While there's
not much you can do about your heredity, your past environment or past
medical treatments, you can live a health-promoting lifestyle now. For
example, you can avoid the standard American diet -- high fat, high sugar,
low fiber, processed foods (known as "the S.A.D.") to eat a healthy, whole
foods diet. You can alter your habits of work, play, and how you relate
to others to reduce stress and have a greater balance of relaxation and
exercise. And you can become an active participant in your health through
self-empowerment strategies. Lifestyle is the area over which you have
the greatest control on a daily basis in recovering from CFS.
Lifestyle
is also of great interest because of findings in the field of psychoneuroimmunology
(PNI). This area of research explains how the brain and immune system communicate
with each other, via the nervous system and chemical messengers in the
blood. The relevance of this for lifestyle is that the mental, emotional,
and spiritual aspects of your life can have impact, both positively and
negatively, on your immune functioning.
However,
while PNI helps us see how the mind can help or harm our immune responses,
it also shows us why recovery from CFS is not simply a question of "mind
over matter." With this illness, matter--or the disease process in the
physical body--affects mind as well. As we shall see later, the symptoms
of CFS, including such cognitive problems as memory loss, anxiety, depression,
and difficulty concentrating, are probably caused by the chemical by-products
of the disease process.
Putting it All together
With this
background, let us now consider the evidence for each part of Goldstein's
description of CFS.
Virally-Induced
A virus is an environmental input which may serve as a trigger for the
syndrome. It is not yet known whether we are dealing with a single virus
or more than one. For a time it was thought that human herpesvirus number
6 (HHV6), discovered in 1987, might be the culprit. HHV6 infiltrates the
T- and B-cells of the immune system, compromising their ability to protect
the body from other viral infections. It also attacks certain neurological
and intestinal tissue, and so is implicated in a great deal of the symptomatology.,
Recent
thinking, however, is that HHV6 is probably not acting alone in CFS. More
likely, this very common virus is reactivated from its normally latent
state by immunologic dysfunction that is caused by yet another agent, possibly
another virus. The theory is that this, along with other latent viruses
such as Epstein Barr and Cytomegalovirus, become active and create their
typical symptoms because the immune system has become unable to keep them
in their normal latent state.
This theory
is supported by one of the most comprehensive studies of CFS, which was
published in the prestigious journal Annals of Internal Medicine in January,
1992. It was based on a study of 259 patients from the practice of Daniel
Peterson, M.D. and his then-partner Paul Cheney, M.D. in Incline Village,
Nevada in the mid-1980's (hereafter called "the Tahoe study"). Two thirds
of the patients were female, the average age was 38+ years, around 40%
were college graduates, and the median length of illness at the time had
reached 1.3 years.
The study
compared these patients with a healthy control group. It gives us one of
the clearest pictures yet of the neurologic and immunologic aspects of
CFS. Some of the findings included:
1. A significantly
elevated T-cell ratio (3.16 versus 2.3 for the healthy comparison group).
This is the ratio of T-helper to T-suppressor cells in the immune system.
These cells and their ratios will be discussed more in Chapter 4, but this
finding indicates that the immune system is trying hard to respond to something.
2. Significantly
more activity of the HHV6 virus. Active replication of the virus was found
in 79% of the patients, and only 20% of the controls.
3. Lesions
in the brain tissue, as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were
found in 78% of patients compared to 21% of the controls.
The strong
implication is that the patients were experiencing a chronic, immunologically-meditated
inflammatory process of the central nervous system. The heightened activity
of HHV6, ordinarily a latent herpesvirus in healthy people, may explain
a great deal of the symptoms since HHV6 is attracted to certain immunological,
neurological, and intestinal cells.
A Retrovirus
Connection? Researchers working independently on both coasts have recently
discovered evidence of a new virus which shows strong evidence as a possible
trigger for CFS. It is a previously unknown member of the class of viruses
known as "retroviruses." A retrovirus is a type of virus that does not
follow the usual disease pattern of other viruses.
First it
attaches itself to a cell wall, then it penetrates the cell. Once inside,
it sheds its outer coat. Then the RNA (genetic material) that was inside
the retrovirus turns itself into DNA (another form of genetic material),
and incorporates itself into the genetic material--the chromosome--of the
human cell. In other words, the retrovirus infiltrates the genetic material
of the human cell and commandeers its machinery, using it to make copies
of the retrovirus RNA. These copies go out of the cell and become separate
retroviral particles that can infect other cells.
In 1990
a team of researchers at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia discovered
evidence of a retrovirus in 80% of a sample of 30 CFS patients, both adults
and children. Similar evidence of exposure was present in a third of twenty
healthy people exposed to the patients. However, no evidence of the retrovirus
was found in twenty healthy, unrelated people.
These findings
suggest the possibility that a retrovirus may be involved in causation
of CFS. If this is the case, it may act by integrating itself into the
genetic material of immune cells and then alter immune functioning, thereby
causing dysregulation or chronic activation of immune responses.,
At the
University of Southern California, John Martin, M.D., Ph.D., a prominent
CFS researcher, has cultured a retrovirus from the blood and cerebrospinal
fluid of several CFS patients. The particular virus he isolated is called
a "foamy" virus, and belongs to a subclass of retroviruses called "spumaviruses."
This type of virus has been largely unknown or unrecognized in humans,
but has been known to infect animals. Interestingly, many animals carry
this type of virus yet remain perfectly healthy. Dr. Martin believes this
spumavirus may be a trigger for CFS by disturbing immune cell functioning.,
According
to Dr. Elaine DeFreitas of the Wistar Institute research team, the theory
of a retrovirus as a causal factor is complicated by the fact that retroviruses
are thought to be transmitted only by vital bodily fluids, and the risky
behavior necessary for this does not fit the typical CFS patient. If this
retrovirus is the long-sought trigger, understanding how it is transmitted
will be a crucial question.
Cytokine-Mediated
Cytokines are special hormones which the immune cells produce in their
attempts to protect the body from infection. Symptoms of CFS may result
from a chronic overproduction of cytokines. In effect, the immune system
is stuck in the "full on" position, and its ability to "down-regulate"
is impaired. Tremendously high levels of certain cytokines--specifically
interleukin II (IL2) and interferon--have been found in CFS patients. These
substances are used in cancer therapy to fight tumors, and as a side effect,
routinely produce the symptoms of CFS in cancer patients. Of course the
symptoms abate when treatment is ended.
Psychoneuroimmunologic Disorder
Mind, brain,
nervous system, and immune system all affect, and are affected by, this
disease process. It follows that the flow of communication among these
systems may also be altered. In fact, many authorities assert that the
involvement of CFS in the brain tissue and cognitive functioning are the
most important and debilitating features of the syndrome.
Genetically-Predisposed Individuals
Some of
us are more vulnerable than others to this condition, based on hereditary
differences in how our immune systems respond to the viruses or other pathogens
involved.
One of
the most important insights about genetic influences is offered by AIDS
research. H.I.V., a retrovirus, is the most studied virus in history, and
more is known about the immune response in AIDS than in any other viral
illness. A research team led by Mary Claire King at the University of California,
Berkeley recently discovered a genetic pattern in people with H.I.V. that
may account for reduced susceptibility to AIDS. As a result of these findings,
a great deal of the tremendous individual variation in how the disease
progresses can be explained. Most likely this applies to other viral diseases
too, and it is consistent with theories of CFS which include a genetic
predisposition to the syndrome.
In summary,
CFS affects the whole person. It is not a simple communicable disease,
attributable to a single cause. Rather it is a result of multiple factors
coming together. According to Dr. Seymour Grufferman, Chairman of Epidemiology
and Preventive Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh, "It is likely
that chronic fatigue syndrome has many etiologies and is a common outcome
of several pathogenic pathways... The occurrence of a disease in clusters
suggests that infectious agents or other common source environmental agents
play a role in the etiology of the disease."
CFS AS AN OPPORTUNISTIC ILLNESS
When we
consider the multiple influences on our health, it is clear that there
are many factors which affect our resistance. And when a state of compromise
or weakened resistance is present, this makes it easier for a pathogen,
such as a virus, to gain a foothold and trigger a disease process. An illness
that arises out of such a state of vulnerability is called an "opportunistic"
illness.
Perhaps
the simplest example of an opportunistic illness is the common cold. We
have all had experiences where we developed a cold after some specific
stressful experience, such as travel to another climate, a period of emotional
upset, final exams, or racing for a deadline. While cold viruses are constantly
around us, it is only under certain circumstances that they find the opportunity
to get a foothold.
The notion
of opportunistic illness applies to other illnesses too. For instance,
it is well known that all of us have cancer cells in our bodies, but few
of us develop cancer. Most adults carry the Epstein-Barr virus (the cause
of mononucleosis), but not all have had mononucleosis. And studies indicate
that not everyone who is HIV-positive develops AIDS. In fact, a few have
even converted back to HIV-negative.,
Research
with CFS strongly indicates that this too is an opportunistic illness.
The presence of its causal agent(s) is necessary but not sufficient to
cause CFS. That is, not everyone who is exposed to the agent(s) develops
CFS. This is evidenced by the fact that few spouses of people with CFS,
presumably having also been exposed, develop the condition. At this time
we do not know whether there are any particular factors that might predispose
someone to developing CFS.
If and
when a specific viral trigger for CFS is confirmed, it is likely that it
will also be found in other people who do not develop the disease. In keeping
with the principle of multi-causality, it too will probably be considered
necessary but not sufficient for the illness.
HOST RESISTANCE
In order
for pathogens such as viruses to flourish, they need a receptive host.
This means a person whose resistance to those pathogens has already been
compromised. And when these pathogens do not flourish, it is because host
resistance has successfully kept them in check. In the case of CFS, the
immune system is at the heart of host resistance.
The concept
of host resistance was the bone of contention in the celebrated struggle
between two famous French researchers during the nineteenth century. Claude
Bernard asserted that the "terrain," or the environment within the individual,
is what allows disease to develop, and should receive the highest priority
in research. For example, if you take a worm out of the moist earth and
isolate it on a rock in the sun, it will die. The worm requires a very
specific terrain in order to flourish.
Louis Pasteur,
Bernard's contemporary, argued vehemently that the presence of individual
pathogens -- germs -- was more important in determining health, and they
should be the focus of research. This bitter rivalry continued for years.
However, on his deathbed, Pasteur recanted and made his famous statement
that "The pathogen is nothing, the terrain is everything."
However,
because CFS is an opportunistic illness relying on weakened host resistance,
and because host resistance is very much affected by the behavior of the
individual, there is a lot you can do to influence the course of your illness.
Self-help and lifestyle change are means by which you can alter the terrain
within your body to promote healing.
RECOVERY: WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
With regard
to CFS, "recovery" is a highly charged term that means different things
to different people. The complex nature of this syndrome provokes us to
look carefully at our use of this word. With many other illnesses, recovery
usually suggests a "return to the old," recovering the old way of life,
resuming the activities and lifestyle to which we had grown accustomed.
Yet, one of the greatest mistakes people with CFS can make is to hold a
vision of recovery as "returning to the way I was living before I got sick."
The difficulty is that, given the multicausal perspective, the way you
were living before you got sick may have been a co-factor in your getting
sick.
This raises
the question of what it is that we hope to recover. Obviously, if you believe
that certain lifestyle factors may have contributed to your vulnerability
to CFS, and your vision is to return to those same conditions, then in
that sense recovery is not desirable, nor is it likely to endure. If, on
the other hand, recovery means re-establishing a sense of equilibrium,
control, harmony, and quality in your life, then yes, recovery is desirable.
Below we
will explore two broad perspectives on the meaning of recovery. One looks
at recovery in quantitative terms, the other in qualitative terms.
Quantitative: Recovering a Prior
Level of Functioning
Many clinicians
and people with CFS think of recovery in terms of activity level or level
of daily functioning. This entails a comparison of your current activity
level to your pre-illness level. This of course is the first concern most
people have, since it addresses the most obvious source of distress with
CFS--not being able to do things in daily functioning like we did before.
This approach defines recovery in quantitative terms, as in how much energy
and activity you have compared to before. In this view, full recovery means
a full return to pre-illness levels.
Clinical
experience indicates that in terms of activity level many patients improve
in two to four years, though not necessarily back to pre-illness levels.
There is however a range of responses. There are those who seem to improve
faster. I have known former patients who, through learning the art of moderation,
have been able to run, windsurf, or ski again. On the other hand, as observed
by Jay Goldstein, M.D. of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Institute of Beverly
Hills, there are a minority of patients who experience progressive worsening
of symptoms.7
While it
is impossible to predict for a given individual what degree of activity
will be reclaimed, there is plenty of reason for hope of re-establishing
a satisfactory level of functioning. This is especially true for those
who take an active role in health promotion. What is "satisfactory" is
of course a subjective judgement, and depends a great deal on your expectations
and standards for what is acceptable.
Qualitative: Recovering a Sense
of Equilibrium and Control
I have
known many former patients who describe themselves as recovered from CFS,
but whose outward lives look very different from before the illness. From
the quantitative point of view, they might be working fewer hours, getting
less achieved, exercising with less intensity or duration, taking more
rest than before, and paying more attention to managing their energy. Yet
there has been a dramatic positive change in their sense of equilibrium
and control in their lives. There is a new understanding and respect for
the body's responses to stress or challenge.
Their values
and interests have changed, making them more appreciative of what they
have. They may place less emphasis on outward performance or achievement,
and more emphasis on living in harmony with their relationships and their
surroundings. And amid all these changes has arisen a clearer sense of
purpose, meaning, and living in balance, qualities that they did not have
before the illness.
As a result,
the recovery they are describing is not a matter of picking up where they
left off. Rather it is a departure from the direction they had been taking
before, an expansion into new ways of living that make their lives richer
and more meaningful. For many, this "recovery" has taken place while adjusting
to and accepting a level of overall energy and outward functioning that
is lower than what they had prior to CFS.
We will
explore the meaning of recovery at greater length in the next chapter.
For now, consider the proposition that where CFS is concerned, recovery
and discovery go hand in hand. The goal should not be limited to recovering
the old, in the quantitative sense; it should include discovering the new.
For some it takes courage to accept that this illness may signal the end
of one way of life and the beginning of another. For others, this may come
as a relief.
Recovery
from CFS is both a challenge and an adventure, and as you will see later
in the stories of others, unexpected rewards await you.
Audio CD Program
Available
Recovering from
CFS:
The Home Self-Empowerment
Program For information about Dr. Collinge's
four-CD audio program of inspirational talks and guided self-healing
exercises that accompany this book, click here.
|